- info@edatainsight.com
- Mon - Sat: 8.00 am - 7.00 pm
We are creative, ambitious and ready for challenges! Contact us
Elementor #11454
DDR ROI Calculator
Enter values as percentages (for example 75), then calculate. ROI breakdown is shown on the second tab.
1. Database Size GB and reduction
⌄
| System | GB | Expected reduction |
|---|---|---|
| PRD | GB |
% |
| QA | GB |
% |
| DEV | GB |
% |
| Training | GB |
% |
| SBX (used as Test in ROI2) | GB |
% |
| Total SAP Storage | 10,000 GB | |
Enter reduction as a percentage. Example: 75 means 75 percent.
2. Growth Rate Percent per year
⌄
| Growth rate | % |
3. Storage Costs Annual
⌄
| Tier 1 cost per GB (PRD) | £/GB/yr |
| Tier 2 cost per GB (QA, DEV, Training, Test) | £/GB/yr |
| Tier 3 cost per GB (optional) | £/GB/yr |
4. Refreshes Resource costs
⌄
| Resource | Cost per hour | Hours per refresh |
|---|---|---|
| Basis | ||
| Developers | ||
| Analysts | ||
| Functional Team |
| Refreshes for QA per year |
After DDR, ROI2 uses 20 percent of the current refresh hours.
5. Development and Transport Failures Data quality
⌄
| Weekly transports | /week |
| QA failures | % |
| Production failures | % |
| DDR expected reduction in failures | % |
| Role | Rate | Employees | Hrs/week |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basis | |||
| Development | |||
| Testing | |||
| Program Mgmt | |||
| Analysis |
Additional repair hours per failed change
| QA | Hours | Production | Hours | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development | Development | |||
| Test | Test | |||
| Basis | Basis | |||
| Project Mgmt | Project Mgmt | |||
| Analysis |
6. Business Failures Outage model
⌄
| Hourly cost per outage (Production) | |
| Average outage time (Hours) | |
| Production failures per year | |
| DDR expected reduction in business failures | % |
7. GDPR and Data Protection Fines Optional
⌄
| Fines paid in the last year |
DDR Investment Year 1–3
⌄
| DDR licence cost per year | |
| Implementation cost (Year 1 only) |
Status: ready
Three year investment
£0
Three year aggregate savings
£0
Three year net savings
£0
ROI2 Summary Year 1–3
⌄
| Metric | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investment | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| Savings (Per Year) | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| Savings (Aggregate) | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| Net Savings | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| ROI | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Payback | Not reached within three years | ||
Disk Cost Model Storage savings
⌄
| Item | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current total disk cost | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| Disk reduction (GB) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Disk cost savings | £0 | £0 | £0 |
Operational and Data Quality Savings Breakdown
⌄
| Resource savings (refresh) | £0 |
| Savings from avoiding failed transports | £0 |
| Outage deficiency savings | £0 |
| Fines (GDPR/SOX/Data protection) | £0 |
| Year 1 total savings | £0 |
Disclaimer
This form is presented on an as is basis. No warranty is given concerning the suitability of the form for any application. The author does not accept liability arising from reliance on any conclusion indicated by this template or any report generated by it, even if defective.
This form is presented on an as is basis. No warranty is given concerning the suitability of the form for any application. The author does not accept liability arising from reliance on any conclusion indicated by this template or any report generated by it, even if defective.
DDR ROI Calculator
Enter values as percentages (for example 75). Select a currency. Then calculate ROI.
1. Database Size GB and reduction⌄
| System | GB | Expected reduction |
|---|---|---|
| PRD | GB | % |
| QA | GB | % |
| DEV | GB | % |
| Training | GB | % |
| SBX (used as Test in ROI2) | GB | % |
| Total SAP Storage | 10,000 GB | |
2. Growth Rate Percent per year⌄
| Growth rate | % |
3. Storage Costs Annual⌄
| Tier 1 cost per GB (PRD) | /GB/yr |
| Tier 2 cost per GB (QA, DEV, Training, Test) | /GB/yr |
| Tier 3 cost per GB (optional) | /GB/yr |
4. Refreshes Resource costs⌄
| Resource | Cost per hour | Hours per refresh |
|---|---|---|
| Basis | ||
| Developers | ||
| Analysts | ||
| Functional Team |
| Refreshes for QA per year |
5. Development and Transport Failures Data quality⌄
| Weekly transports | /week |
| QA failures | % |
| Production failures | % |
| DDR expected reduction in failures | % |
| Role | Rate | Employees | Hrs/week |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basis | |||
| Development | |||
| Testing | |||
| Program Mgmt | |||
| Analysis |
Additional repair hours per failed change
| QA | Hours | Production | Hours | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development | Development | |||
| Test | Test | |||
| Basis | Basis | |||
| Project Mgmt | Project Mgmt | |||
| Analysis |
6. Business Failures Outage model⌄
| Hourly cost per outage (Production) | |
| Average outage time (Hours) | |
| Production failures per year | |
| DDR expected reduction in business failures | % |
7. GDPR and Data Protection Fines Optional⌄
| Fines paid in the last year |
DDR Investment Year 1–3⌄
| DDR licence cost per year | |
| Implementation cost (Year 1 only) |
Status: ready
Three year investment
£0
Three year aggregate savings
£0
Three year net savings
£0
ROI2 Summary Year 1–3⌄
| Metric | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Investment | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| Savings (Per Year) | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| Savings (Aggregate) | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| Net Savings | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| ROI | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Payback | Not reached within three years | ||
Disk Cost Model Storage savings⌄
| Item | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current total disk cost | £0 | £0 | £0 |
| Disk reduction (GB) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Disk cost savings | £0 | £0 | £0 |
Operational and Data Quality Savings Breakdown⌄
| Resource savings (refresh) | £0 |
| Savings from avoiding failed transports | £0 |
| Outage deficiency savings | £0 |
| Fines (GDPR/SOX/Data protection) | £0 |
| Year 1 total savings | £0 |
Disclaimer
This form is presented on an as is basis. No warranty is given concerning the suitability of the form for any application. The author does not accept liability arising from reliance on any conclusion indicated by this template or any report generated by it, even if defective.
This form is presented on an as is basis. No warranty is given concerning the suitability of the form for any application. The author does not accept liability arising from reliance on any conclusion indicated by this template or any report generated by it, even if defective.